The seventh day of the COPA v. Wright trial kicked off on Tuesday, exposing a glaring weakness in the latterās argument to convince the court that he is the creator of Bitcoin.
When pressed by prosecutors, Craig Wright failed to name a single person outside of the public domain to whom he had sent Bitcoin under the name of Satoshi.
As summarized by @bitnorbert on X, COPA asked the computer scientist to confirm whether heād ever sent BTC to anyone besides Hal Finney or Zooko Wilcox ā the co-founder of ZCash.
Wright asserted that he had sent Bitcoin to hundreds of people, through a mix of his companies whose blockchain addresses were publicly understood as being owned by Satoshi Nakamoto. He said Zooko was not one of them, however, despite the cryptographer himself asserting heād never received BTC from Satoshi.
When asked about the coins Satoshi had transferred to āhundredsā of others, Wright said he doesnāt āremember them all now.ā Judge Edward James Mellor asked Wright to name just one, but he fell short.
Wright also faced questions about a public blog post heād once purportedly signed to prove he was Satoshi that has since been fiercely criticized by experts. When asked whether āsigning sessionsā would be invalid proof if the private keys behind them could be obtained by people besides Satoshi, Wright said āNot at all.ā
āYou donāt prove by having identity through possession of something. You prove by knowledge. Who you are. What you create,ā Wright said.
Tuesday marks Wrightās sixth day on the stand under cross-examination Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a non-profit group backed by Meta, Block, and MicroStrategy.
The organizationās goal is to prove that Wright has committed āindustrial scale forgeryā, and prevent him from suing anybody who publicly proclaims that he isnāt Satoshi, as heās done in the past.
Reflecting on Tuesdayās proceedings, @bitnorbert said it āwas the strongest showing of Bitcoiners in court today.ā
Wright has spent his time under cross-examination aiming to discredit several expert witnesses who have called his defenseās evidence forgeries ā including Spencer Lynch, who was hired by his own legal team.
The post Craig Wright Fails To Name Anyone He Sent Bitcoin To As āSatoshiā appeared first on CryptoPotato.
When pressed by prosecutors, Craig Wright failed to name a single person outside of the public domain to whom he had sent Bitcoin under the name of Satoshi.
Who Did Satoshi Send Bitcoin To?
As summarized by @bitnorbert on X, COPA asked the computer scientist to confirm whether heād ever sent BTC to anyone besides Hal Finney or Zooko Wilcox ā the co-founder of ZCash.
Wright asserted that he had sent Bitcoin to hundreds of people, through a mix of his companies whose blockchain addresses were publicly understood as being owned by Satoshi Nakamoto. He said Zooko was not one of them, however, despite the cryptographer himself asserting heād never received BTC from Satoshi.
When asked about the coins Satoshi had transferred to āhundredsā of others, Wright said he doesnāt āremember them all now.ā Judge Edward James Mellor asked Wright to name just one, but he fell short.
āGavin has talked about that now. It had no value at the time, My Lord. Most were pseudonymous,ā he argued.
Wright also faced questions about a public blog post heād once purportedly signed to prove he was Satoshi that has since been fiercely criticized by experts. When asked whether āsigning sessionsā would be invalid proof if the private keys behind them could be obtained by people besides Satoshi, Wright said āNot at all.ā
āYou donāt prove by having identity through possession of something. You prove by knowledge. Who you are. What you create,ā Wright said.
Wright āFalling Apartā
Tuesday marks Wrightās sixth day on the stand under cross-examination Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a non-profit group backed by Meta, Block, and MicroStrategy.
The organizationās goal is to prove that Wright has committed āindustrial scale forgeryā, and prevent him from suing anybody who publicly proclaims that he isnāt Satoshi, as heās done in the past.
Reflecting on Tuesdayās proceedings, @bitnorbert said it āwas the strongest showing of Bitcoiners in court today.ā
āAll in all, it was another day of a cornered man helplessly falling apart in court, his counsel forced to sit in silence and watch,ā he wrote to X on Tuesday. Judge Mellor, he noted, had to interrupt Wright several times to āget an answer out of him.ā
Wright has spent his time under cross-examination aiming to discredit several expert witnesses who have called his defenseās evidence forgeries ā including Spencer Lynch, who was hired by his own legal team.
The post Craig Wright Fails To Name Anyone He Sent Bitcoin To As āSatoshiā appeared first on CryptoPotato.